Registration and Publication

Registration should be on the basis of affiliation and membership of 1st author. Authors of accepted papers will have to submit fee as per the category mentioned below.

Delegates

All the accepted and presented papers in the Conference will be Published with Taylor and Francis conference proceedings.

*For extra pages (more than 6), per page 1000 INR for Indian and 50 USD for foreign

Peer Review Policy

The peer-reviewed manuscripts have been classified into three screening stages. During the screening, the reviewer must focus on the originality and novelty of the manuscript. The article should possess scientific soundness and industrial significance with good quality presentation.

Screening Process

• Submitted papers must correspond to one of the topics of the conference
• The paper should not have an Incomplete Structure
• Plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and AI content check using Turnitin software
• Quality of tables or figures as per the publication standards
• Declaration from the corresponding author that he/she has obtained the consent of all the co-authors before including their names in the paper
• Revisions may be requested during the review process.
• The second peer review may be requested after major/minor revision.
• The final decisions of acceptance or rejection are made by the Chair

Responsibilities of Reviewers:

Reviewers play a critical role in the peer review process, and they are expected to provide fair, objective, and constructive feedback on submitted manuscripts. They should evaluate the work based on its intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. Reviewers must maintain the confidentiality of the manuscripts they review and must not use information obtained during the peer review process for personal gain. Any potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed to the editorial board, and reviewers should recuse themselves from the review process if they feel unable to provide an impartial evaluation.

Responsibilities of the Editorial Board:

The editorial board is responsible for ensuring the integrity of the publication process. They should make decisions on submissions based solely on the academic merit of the work and its relevance to the conference’s scope. The editorial board must ensure that the review process is conducted fairly, confidentially, and without bias. They are also responsible for identifying and addressing any ethical issues that may arise, such as suspected plagiarism, data manipulation, or conflicts of interest. The board is committed to maintaining transparency throughout the publication process and will take appropriate action in cases of malpractice, which may include rejecting manuscripts, issuing retractions, or reporting misconduct to the authors’ institutions.

Handling Ethical Misconduct:

The ICAS 2025 takes ethical misconduct seriously and has established procedures to address such issues. If unethical behaviour is suspected, the editorial board will investigate the matter thoroughly. If misconduct is confirmed, appropriate actions will be taken, which may include the rejection of the manuscript, notifying the authors’ institutions, and banning the authors from future participation in the conference. All investigations and actions will be conducted in accordance with the principles of fairness, confidentiality, and transparency.

Account Details

Important note: Please ensure your submission meets the conference’s strict guidelines for accepting scholarly papers. Downloadable versions of the check list for Full-Text Papers and Abstract Papers. Please refer to the Paper Submission GUIDE before submitting your paper.